Engineering
Training that changes the drawing
Most fastener cost is decided before a supplier is involved — in the drawing, the thread callout and the tolerance that nobody needed. Four modules aimed at that moment.
Curriculum
Four modules, in the order that makes sense
Each module stands alone, but the sequence is deliberate: process first, then quality, then design. Understanding how the part is made is what makes the design guidance stick.
01
Fastener manufacturing process
What actually happens between a wire coil and a carton: cold forging, thread rolling, heat treatment, surface treatment, sorting. Engineers who have not seen the process tend to specify features that are expensive or impossible to form.
02
Quality planning for fasteners
Which characteristics are worth controlling, which inspection is meaningful at micro sizes, and how a control plan maps onto a drawing. This is the module that usually changes how a drawing is written.
03
Fastener design and selection — basic
Thread, head, drive, material and finish fundamentals, plus the standard parts that already exist. A large share of new part numbers turn out to be a standard part with a different name.
04
Fastener design and selection — advanced
Preload, friction, joint stiffness, locking methods and the failure modes that only appear after thermal cycling or vibration. Aimed at engineers already comfortable with the basics.
Formats
Three ways to run it
The content is the same; the format decides how much of it survives the week after.
Customised training
Built around your product and your drawings. Participants work on their own assemblies rather than on generic examples, which is why this format produces the most change.
Seminars
A single session for a larger group — typically design, quality and procurement in the same room, so that the trade-offs are heard by everyone who has to live with them.
Online training
For teams that are distributed or cannot take a full day out. Recorded or live, and usually split into shorter sessions to fit around production.
Outcome
What the programme is expected to change
Two figures are documented for this service: design efficiency up by 20%, and quality cost down by 15%. They are expectations, and they are stated as such — the result depends on how much design freedom still exists when the training happens.
The reasoning behind them is simple. A part that is specified correctly the first time does not go through three rounds of sample approval, and a characteristic that is controlled for a reason does not generate inspection cost that nobody can justify later.
Questions
Training FAQ
Who is the training for?
Is there a charge?
What outcome is expected?
Can it be delivered in English?
Run a session with your team
Tell us the product family and the audience. The modules get rebuilt around your drawings rather than delivered from a slide deck.